ERISA Withdrawal Liability Action
In Resilient Floor Covering Pension Fund v. M&M Installation, Inc., No. 09-17047, an action on a theory of ERISA withdrawal liability, the court reversed summary judgment for plaintiff where, assuming it is possible to be responsible on an alter ego theory, a non-union company may be liable when there is commonality between the union and nonunion firms and an abuse of the double-breasted structure to avoid payment of withdrawal liability.
Related Resources
- Read the Ninth Circuit’s Decision in Resilient Floor Covering Pension Fund v. M&M Installation, Inc., No. 09-17047
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
