In an action for trademark infringement, false designation of origin, and dilution under the Lanham Act, district court’s dismissal for failure to state a claim is vacated and remanded where plaintiff’s allegations that Google’s recommendation and sale of plaintiff’s mark to its advertisers triggers the appearance of plaintiff’s advertisements and links in a manner likely to cause consumer confusion when a Google user launches a search of plaintiff’s trademark, adequately pleads a use in commerce and is a proper claim under the Lanham Act.
Read Rescuecom Corp. v. Google, Inc., No. 06-4881
Appellate InformationAppeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York. Argued: April 3, 2008Decided: April 3, 3009Errata Opinion: July 28, 2009
JudgesBefore: LEVAL, CALABRESI, WESLEY, Circuit Judges.Opinion by LEVAL, Circuit Judge.
CounselFor Appellant: Edmund J. Gegan, Rescuecom Corporation, Syracuse, New York.
For Appellee: Michael H. Page, Keker & Van Nest, LLP, San Francisco, California.
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
