In a First Amendment challenge to a municipal sign regulation that prohibited all signs without a permit, subject to nineteen enumerated exemptions ranging from directional signs to ideological and political signs, a denial of a preliminary injunction is affirmed in part where the regulation was content-neutral and did not impermissibly favor commercial speech. However, the order is remanded in part where the district court did not address plaintiff’s claim that the ordinance unfairly discriminates among forms of noncommercial speech.
Read Reed v. Gilbert, No. 08-17384
Appellate Information
Argued and Submitted April 15, 2009
Filed November 20, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge McKeown
Counsel
For Appellants:
Benjamin W. Bull, Jeremy D. Tedesco, Alliance Defense Fund, Scottsdale, AZ
David A. Cortman, Alliance Defense Fund, Lawrenceville, GA
For Appellees:
Robert Grasso, Jr., Kim S. Alvarado, Grasso Law Firm, P.C., Chandler, AZ
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
