In a petition for review of Respondent power administration’s decision to execute an amended contract with an aluminum company, agreeing to make a payment to the aluminum company so it could purchase power from one of Respondent’s competitors, the petition is granted, where the transaction was not consistent with sound business principles.
Read Pacific Northwest Generating Coop. v. Bonneville Power Admin., No. 09-70228
Appellate Information
Argued and Submitted July 7, 2009
Filed August 28, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Berzon
Counsel
For Petitioners:
Erick Johnson, Lake Oswego, OR
Mark R. Thompson, Portland, OR
For Respondent:
Randy A. Roach, General Counsel, Bonneville Power Administration, Portland, OR
Timothy A. Johnson, Assistant General Counsel, Portland, OR
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
