In an action for insurance proceeds arising out of a car accident, summary judgment for defendant-insurer is reversed where the policy’s exclusion of resident relatives who own a vehicle from Uninsured Motorist/Underinsured Motorist (UM/UIM) coverage violated Colorado public policy and thus there were issues of fact regarding whether defendant properly advised and offered UM/UIM coverage in an amount equal to the bodily injury limits for that policy.
Read Pacheco v. Shelter Mut. Ins. Co., No. 08-1046
Appellate Information
Filed October 2, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Seymour
Counsel
For Appellant:
William Babich, The Law Firm of William Babich, LLC, Denver, CO
For Appellees:
Steven J. Dawes, Light Harrington & Dawes, P.C., Denver, CO
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
