In a Bivens action arising out of an allegedly unlawful strip search of a prisoner, summary judgment for defendants is affirmed where: 1) plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies with respect to his First Amendment claim; and 2) the evidence plaintiff presented that a guard was motivated to search him for non-penological reasons was irrelevant to the reasonableness of the search.
Read Nunez v. Duncan, No. 04-36146
Appellate Information
Argued and Submitted May 6, 2009
Filed January 11, 2010
Judges
Opinion by Judge Fletcher
Dissent by Judge Ikuta
Counsel
For Appellant:
Banurekha Ramachandran, Perkins Coie, LLP, Portland, OR
For Appellees:
Margaret M. Ogden and Amy Potter, Federal Bureau of Prisons, SeaTac, WA
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
