In a discrimination action brought under Age Discrimination in Employment ACt, district court judgment is affirmed where plaintiff failed to show directly or indirectly that there was intentional age discrimination in the defendant’s reduction in workforce decision to fire him.
Read Martino v. MCI Communications Services, Inc., No. 08-2405
Appellate InformationAppeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division.Argued May 28, 2009Decided: July 28, 2009
JudgesBefore CUDAHY, EVANS, and TINDER, Circuit Judges.Opinion by EVANS, Circuit Judge.
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules