In a personal injury action based on injuries plaintiff suffered while diving from defendant’s ship, judgment for defendant is affirmed where the rule from The Pennsylvania, 86 U.S. (1 Wall.) 125 (1873), which puts on the ship owner the burden of proving that its violation of a statute or regulation did not cause the injury, did not apply because there must be a threshold causal connection between the violation and the injury before the Rule will apply.
Read MacDonald v. Kahikolu, Ltd., No. 08-15239
Appellate Information
Argued and Submitted June 12, 2009
Filed September 10, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge B. Fletcher
Counsel
For Appellant:
John R. Hillsman, McGuinn, Hillsman & Palefsky, San Francisco, CA
For Appellee:
Richard C. Wootton, Cox, Wootton, Griffin, Hansen & Poulos, LLP, San Francisco, CA
Mitchell S. Griffin, Cox, Wootton, Griffin, Hansen & Poulos, LLP, San Francisco, CA
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
