In a breach of contract action, district court judgment is affirmed where: 1) any error the district court made in submitting jury instructions concerning material breach and inclusion of language relating to notice of termination was harmless as it did not affect substantial rights; and 2) the court did not abuse its discretion in declining to limit damages to foreseeable losses.
Read M.M. Silta, Inc. v. Cleveland Cliffs, Inc., No. 08-2620
Appellate InformationAppeal from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota. Submitted: March 11, 2009Filed: July 16, 2009
JudgesBefore WOLLMAN, BRIGHT, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.Opinion by WOLLMAN, Chief Judge.
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
