In habeas corpus proceedings following the Minnesota Supreme Court’s affirmation of the revocation of petitioner’s probation and the execution of her stayed 120 month sentence for aiding and abetting kidnapping, denial of the petition is affirmed where: 1) the state supreme court’s conclusion that a Fields appeal was not a form of direct review under Minnesota law was not contrary to or an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law; and 2) Jimenez v. Quarterman, 129 S. Ct. 681 (2009), was not clearly established federal law at the time of the state supreme court’s decision.
Read Losh v. Fabian, No. 09-1394
Appellate Information
Submitted: November 18, 2009
Filed: January 4, 2010
Judges
Opinion by Judge Murphy
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
