In a capital habeas matter, a denial of the habeas petition is affirmed where: 1) there was no Supreme Court authority clearly establishing the proper reconciliation of the competing double-jeopardy principles at issue, which was fatal to his claim; and 2) it was neither arbitrary nor capricious for a state court of appeals to retain and exercise its customary appellate authority to correct the trial court’s error in the event the trial court failed to take the required action.
Read Lambert v. Workman, No. 09-5108
Appellate Information
Filed February 12, 2010
Judges
Opinion by Judge Hartz
Counsel
For Appellant:
Jonathan S. Willett, Denver, CO
For Appellees:
Matthew T. Kirsch and James C. Murphy, Assistant United States Attorneys, Denver, CO
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
