In a Freedom of Information Act action seeking documents pertaining to a government investigation of a plane crash, the District Court’s order requiring the production of some of the documents sought is affirmed in part, where certain documents were not protected by the deliberative process privilege; but reversed in part, where the eyewitness testimony sought would infringe protected privacy interests.
Read Lahr v. National Transp. Safety Bd., No. 06-56717
Appellate Information
Argued August 8, 2008
Decided June 22, 2009
Judges
Before: Roger J. Miner, Kim McLane Wardlaw and Marsha S. Berzon, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Berzon
Counsel
For Plaintiff:
John H. Clarke, Washington, D.C.
For Defendants:
Steve Frank, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.
Leonard Schaitman, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.
George S. Cardona, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.
Peter D. Keisler, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
