In a dispute involving the revocation of a retirement health plan, district court judgment is affirmed where it properly dismissed plaintiff’s suit for lack of subject matter jurisdiction as defendant is a political subdivision of Pennsylvania, and thus, its benefit plan constitutes a governmental plan exempt from ERISA under 29 U.S.C. sec. 1003(b)(1).
Read Koval v. Washington County Redevelopment Authority, No. 08-2492
Appellate InformationAppeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. Submitted May 19, 2009Filed July 23, 2009
JudgesBefore: FUENTES, JORDAN, and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges.Opinion by FUENTES, Circuit Judge.
CounselFor Appellant: Peter M. Suwak. For Appellee: John M. Giunta, Cipriani & Werner.
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
