To say Judge Boyce Martin of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals loathes the death penalty process is a gross understatement. The court’s vociferous liberal lion may be retiring, but he did anything but mince his words in Nicholas v. Heidle, his final capital case.
Martin, 77, who often sported a bow tie in his more than three decades on the bench, concurred with the majority denying a death-row inmate’s habeas claim. But Martin said he would “continue to condemn the use of the death penalty as an arbitrary, biased, and broken criminal justice tool.”
The liberal lion is slated to retire Friday (August 16), due largely in part to his wife and himself battling cancer, according to the Louisville Courier-Journal.
“It is time to go,” Judge Martin told the Courier-Journal. “I want to go out at the top of my game rather than having to be carried up and down from the bench.”
Despite having to bow out from court earlier than expected, his legacy in the court will surely remain – that of a forceful voice against capital punishment.
A Final Call to (More Productive) Action
From quoting Homer Simpson to expounding on the history of bourbon (“All bourbon is whiskey, but not all whiskey is bourbon”), no one can quite capture Martin’s spirit as he can in his own words.
So it only makes sense to leave you with a particularly poignant part of his final death penalty opinion concerning Nichols, who was convicted in 1990 and meant to be executed in 1994:
Related Resources:
- 6th Circuit judge condemns death penalty as ‘arbitrary, biased and broken’ in parting opinion (ABA Journal)
- 6th Circuit Finds Prosecutorial Misconduct in Death Penalty Case (FindLaw’s U.S. Sixth Circuit Blog)
- Federal Judge Denies Death Row Request for MRI (FindLaw’s U.S. Sixth Circuit Blog)
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules