In plaintiff’s 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action against two police officers on behalf of the estate of her husband arising from a high speed chase of armed robbery suspects that killed her husband in an automobile crash, summary judgment in favor of the defendant police officers is affirmed where: 1) the estate did not establish a prima facie case of deprivation of the husband’s substantive due process rights as officers’ actions of trying to apprehend what they reasonably believed to be dangerous criminals do not shock the conscience; and 2) in the alternative, even if the officers’ actions did rise to the level of violating the husband’s constitutional rights, it was not clearly established at the time of the incident that actions of that sort crossed the constitutional line.
Read Jones v. Byrnes, No. 08-1889
Appellate Information
Argued: October 9, 2009
Decided and Filed: November 9, 2009
Judges
Per Curium Opinion
Counsel
For Appellant: Joel B. Sklar, Law Office, Detroit, Michigan.
For Appellee: Joseph Nimako, Cummings McClorey Davis & Acho, PLC., Livonia, Michigan
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
