In a habeas petition under the Indian Civil Rights Act, claiming that petitioners’ disenrollment by members of the Pechanga Tribal Council was tantamount to an unlawful detention, denial of the petition is affirmed where the tribe did not detain petitioners within the meaning of the Act, and thus, the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction.
Read Jeffredo v. Macarro, No. 08-55037
Appellate Information
Argued and Submitted April 17, 2009
Filed December 22, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Smith
Dissent by Judge Wilken
Counsel
For Appellants:
Paul Harris and Patrick Romero Guillory, Dolores Park Law Offices, San Francisco, CA
For Appellees:
Frank Lawrence, Holland and Knight, Los Angeles, CA
John Schumacher, Law Office of John Schumacher, LLC, Riverton, WY
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
