The complaint of judicial misconduct against Chief Judge Alex Kozinski of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit with respect his website is concluded under Rule 20(b)(1)(B) of the Rules for Judicial-Conduct and Judicial-Disability Proceedings, as appropriate corrective action has been taken. To the extent the complaint involves the Judge’s conduct in the United States v. Isaacs case, that portion is dismissed under Rule 20(b)(1)(A)(i) as neither the Judge’s assignment to the Isaacs case nor his decision to recuse himself from it constituted conduct cognizable under the Judicial Conduct and Disability Act.
Read In re Complaint of Judicial Misconduct, No. 09-08-90035
Appellate InformationOriginal Proceedings under 28 U.S.C. § 351Transferred from the Judicial Council of the Ninth CircuitFiled June 5, 2009
JudgesBefore SCIRICA, Chief Judge, SLOVITER, McKEE, RENDELL, BARRY, AMBRO, AMBROSE, BROWN, BARTLE, KANE, and SLEET, Members of the Judicial Council.Opinion by SCIRICA, Chief Judge.
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
