Supplemental Security Income Benefit Case

In Hulsey v. Astrue, No. 09-2838, plaintiff’s appeal from the judgment of the district court upholding the Social Security Commissioner’s decision to deny her application for supplemental security income benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, the court affirmed where, even assuming for the sake of argument that plaintiff was unable to perform some unskilled work, the Appeals Council’s conclusion that plaintiff could perform housekeeping work was supported by substantial evidence.

 

Related Resources

  • Read the Eighth Circuit’s Decision in Hulsey v. Astrue, No. 09-2838

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Civil Rights

Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court

Criminal

Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records

Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules