In a petition for review of the BIA’s order denying petitioner’s asylum application, the petition is denied where: 1) the BIA’s conclusion that an involuntary IUD insertion was not an “involuntary sterilization” was permissible under Chevron; and 2) thus, the BIA’s interpretation that a forced IUD insertion is not a per se ground for granting asylum is entitled to deference.
Read Huang v. Holder, No. 08-5785
Appellate Information
Argued November 23, 2009
Filed January 12, 2010
Judges
Per Curiam
Counsel
For Petitioner:
Davi X. Feng, New York, NY
For Respondent:
Kiley L. Kane, Michael F. Hertz and Jennifer L. Lightbody, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
