In a Title VII action based on defendants’ alleged retaliation against plaintiffs for their complaints regarding workplace discrimination, summary judgment for defendants is affirmed in part where plaintiffs’ allegations in support of many of their claims were overly conclusory. However, the order is vacated in part where a reasonable jury could find for plaintiffs on their claims regarding defendant’s allegedly punitive changes to plaintiff’s work schedule.
Read Hicks v. Baines, No. 06-3782
Appellate Information
Argued: April 13, 2009
Decided: February 2, 2010
Judges
Opinion by Judge Jacobs
Counsel
For Appellant:
David J. Seeger, Law Office of David J. Seeger, Buffalo, NY
For Appellee:
William R. Hites, Law Office of William Hites, Buffalo, NY
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
