In a trade secret misappropriation action, partial judgment for plaintiffs and defendants is affirmed in part where plaintiff failed to present adequate claims of tortious interference with contract and prospective business advantage. The ruling is reversed in part, however, where the question of whether defendant’s manufacturing process was a trade secret was a question of fact that could not be resolved on the current record.
Read Hertz v. Luzenac Group, No. 06-1324
Appellate Information
Filed August 11, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Holmes
Counsel
For Appellant:
Andrew M. Low, Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP, Denver, CO
Janet A. Savage, Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP, Denver, CO
For Appellee:
Theresa L. Corrada, Issacson Rosenbaum P.C., Denver, CO
Byeongsook Seo, Issacson Rosenbaum P.C., Denver, CO
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
