In an action for breach of a franchise agreement, judgment for Defendant is affirmed, where 1) Plaintiff presented insufficient evidence that his franchise agreement had been modified; and 2) Plaintiff’s unclean hands gave the District Court authority to deny him an equitable estoppel remedy.
Read Haynes Trane Serv. Agency v. Am. Std., Inc., No. 07-1441
Appellate Information
Filed July 6, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Hartz
Counsel
For Appellants:
Marcy G. Glenn, Holland & Hart LLP, Denver, CO
For Appellee:
Daniel M. Reilly, Reilly Pozner & Connelly LLP, Denver, CO
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
