In an action for tortious interference by an insurance broker against an insurer (Prudential), district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Prudential is affirmed as Prudential’s interference was privileged as a matter of Ohio law.
Read Havensure, LLC v. Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., No 09-3367
Appellate Information
Argued: January 12, 2010
Decided and Filed: February 12, 2010
Judges
Opinion by Circuit Judge Boggs
Counsel
For Appellant: Robert R. Sparks, Parry Deering Futscher & Sparks, PSC.
For Appellee: Michael Nathan Ungar, Ulmer & Berne, LLP
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
