In an action under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act claiming that Defendants falsely stated in state-court complaints that a certain document was a statement of Plaintiff’s account, summary judgment for Defendants is reversed where there was an issue of material fact as to whether Defendants’ representations were misleading or deceptive.
Read Hartman v. Great Seneca Fin. Corp., No. 08-3773
Appellate Information
Submitted: June 18, 2009
Decided and Filed: June 30, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Moore
Dissenting opinion by Judge White
Counsel
For Appellants:
Stephen R. Felson, Law Office, Cincinnati, OH
For Appellees:
Michael D. Slodov, Javitch, Block & Rathbone LLP, Cleveland, OH
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
