In an action alleging that Defendants breached their fiduciary duties under ERISA in the operation of a corporation’s retirement plans, the dismissal of the complaint is reversed where plaintiff had standing as an ERISA plan participant to seek relief under 29 U.S.C. section 1132(a)(2), despite having withdrawn all of his assets from his plan.
Read Harris v. Amgen, Inc., No. 08-55389
Appellate Information
Argued and Submitted May 8, 2009
Filed July 14, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Gould
Counsel
For Appellants:
Mark C. Rifkin, Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP, San Diego, CA
For Appellees:
Steven O. Kramer, Mayer Brown LLP, Los Angeles, CA
Robert P. Davis, Mayer Brown LLP, Los Angeles, CA
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
