In a First Amendment challenge to a city’s adult business zoning ordinances, the District Court’s order granting partial summary judgment to both parties is affirmed in part, where the ordinances were content-neutral and facially constitutional; but reversed in part, where, once the ordinances were declared unconstitutional as applied to Plaintiff, Plaintiff became entitled to use its property for any lawful purpose.
Read H.D.V.-Greektown, LLC v. Detroit, No. 08-1329.
ARGUED: Bradley J. Shafer, SHAFER & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Lansing, Michigan, for Appellants. Jeffrey S. Jones, CITY OF DETROIT LAW DEPARTMENT, Detroit, Michigan, for Appellee.
ON BRIEF: Bradley J. Shafer, Andrea E. Pritzlaff, SHAFER & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Lansing, Michigan, for Appellants. Jeffrey S. Jones, CITY OF DETROIT LAW DEPARTMENT, Detroit, Michigan, for Appellee.
OPINION AUTHORED BY RONALD LEE GILMAN, Circuit Judge.
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
