In a medical malpractice action brought under the Federal Tort Claims Act, district court judgment is affirmed where: 1) the court did not abuse its decision in allowing certain expert testimony as there was no evidence that plaintiff was unduly prejudiced by an unannounced review of x-rays by the expert; and 2) the court did not err in its evaluation of witness credibility and in crediting the witness’ opinions as to the propriety of the care that plaintiff received.
Read Gicla v. US, No. 08-1648
Appellate InformationAppeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division.Argued January 13, 2009Decided July 15, 2009
JudgesBefore BAUER, POSNER, and ROVNER, Circuit Judges.Opinion by ROVNER, Circuit Judge.
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
