In a general contractor’s suit against its insurers claiming that they had a duty to defend it in third-party litigation arising out of a construction dispute, judgment in favor of defendants is reversed as the exclusion provision at issue applies only to the cost of repairing or replacing distinct component parts on which the insured performed defective work.
Read Fortney & Weygandt, Inc. v. Am. Mfrs. Mut. Ins. Co., No. 05-4031
Appellate Information
Argued: January 22, 2010
Decided and Filed: February 12, 2010
Judges
Opinion by Circuit Judge Kethledge
Counsel
For Appellant: Michael L. Fortney, Fortney & Klingshirn
For Appellee: Kathleen A. Sweitzer, Tressler Soderstrom Maloney & Priess, LLP
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
