In plaintiff’s Title VII case against his employer for racial harassment, discriminatory wage, and retaliation, district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the employer is affirmed where: 1) there is no genuine issues of fact with respect to the existence of racial harassment; 2) plaintiff has failed to satisfy the fourth element regarding disparate wage treatment because he adduced no evidence that higher paid workers were similarly situated; and 3) plaintiff has failed to present evidence that he suffered an adverse employment action because he engaged in an activity protected by Title VII.
Read Ford v. Minteq Shapes & Serv., Inc., No. 09-2140
Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, Hammond Division
Decided November 24, 2009
Judges
Before: Bauer and Wood, Circuit Judges
Opinion by Bauer, Judge
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
