In a capital murder matter, the District Court’s order denying Petitioner’s motion seeking funds to hire a neuropsychologist to assist in the preparation of his state clemency petition is affirmed, where Petitioner advanced no evidence from which the District Court could find that the proposed evaluation would not be duplicative.
Read Fautenberry v. Mitchell, No. 09-3819
Appellate Information
Submitted: July 7, 2009
Decided and Filed: July 10, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Batchelder
Counsel
For Appellant:
Dennis Lyle Sipe, Buell & Sipe Co., Marietta, OH
For Appellee:
Justin M. Lovett, Office of the Ohio Attorney General, Columbus, OH
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
