In an ERISA action for health benefits, judgment for defendant is affirmed where plaintiff’s stay at a residential treatment center that had no contract with defendant-insurer was not covered under plaintiff’s health plan.
Read Dupree v. Holman Prof’l. Counseling Ctrs., No. 07-55617
Appellate Information
Argued and Submitted October 22, 2008
Filed July 29, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Hall
Dissent by Judge Pregerson
Counsel
For Appellants:
Lisa S. Kantor, Kantor & Kantor, Northridge, CA
For Appellees:
Robert C. Bohner, Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, Los Angeles, CA
Michael A. Vanic, Reish Luftman Reicher & Cohen, Los Angeles, CA
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
