Chris Hogan was once employed by UTOPIA, the Utah Telecommunication Open Infrastructure Agency. He claims he was fired after he revealed conflicts of interest in contract awards. After Hogan was fired, he threatened to sue the agency unless he was paid $219,000 in damages and the agency’s executive director was also fired.

Coincidentally, an unflattering article appeared in a local newspaper discussing Hogan’s termination and calling his demand for damages “extortion” and “blackmail.” The article’s author, “Richard Burwash,” was a pseudonym for Mike Winder, the mayor of West Valley, Utah, where the agency did much of its business.

Hogan’s lawsuit dealt mostly with defamation, but the Tenth Circuit was having none of it.

Specifically, the Tenth Circuit dismissed defamation claims for two different sets of statements in the newspaper article. The first claim involved the statement that Hogan was fired for “erratic behavior” and “performance reasons.” The court said these statements were too vague for anyone to take seriously as defamatory.

The second statement concerned the characterization of Hogan’s actions as “extortion” and “blackmail.” Emphasizing the context of the statements, they didn’t bother the court one bit. Such accusations, the court said, are often used as a “familiar rhetorical device” and reasonable people, recognizing the use of such a rhetorical device, wouldn’t believe that he actually was being accused of a crime.

And even the headline – “Former UTOPIA contractor accused of extortion” – would be understood by these Reasonable Readers, wherever they are, as being ambiguous; they’re sophisticated enough to know the difference between being accused of a crime, prosecuted for a crime, and convicted of a crime, the court explained.

That Is One Reasonable Person

Finding no defamation, the Tenth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of Hogan’s claims of false light invasion of privacy (there’s no false light if there are no defamatory statements), intentional infliction of emotional distress (not outrageous enough), conspiracy, and his Section 1983 claims. Even though the author of the article was West Valley’s mayor, he wasn’t acting “under color of law” at the time, the court said.

As the Tenth Circuit emphasized again and again, context is important. That Reasonable Person we’ve heard so much about really knows his stuff: so much so that he can even prevent a prima facie claim from being made. What a guy!

Related Resources:

  • Appeals court affirms news coverage of former UTOPIA employee not defamatory (Deseret News)
  • Cooley Law School’s Defamation Suit Dismissal Upheld by 6th Cir. (FindLaw’s Greedy Associates)
  • Hilarious ‘F U’ Letter Mocks Frivolous Defamation Threats (FindLaw’s Strategist)
  • Ex-Minn. Gov. Jesse Ventura Wins $1.8M in Defamation Suit (FindLaw’s Injured)

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Civil Rights

Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court

Criminal

Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records

Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules