In June 2017, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the $11 million judgment against Toyota stemming from an unintended acceleration case that left three people dead, and put the driver behind bars for over two years. Toyota requested reconsideration of the matter, and a month later, in August 2017, the Eighth Circuit upheld the judgment against them once again.

The big issue that Toyota sought reconsideration on, apart from the size of the judgment, involved the evidence of “other similar incidents.” In the case, testimony from three other individuals, unrelated to the accident in the present case, described situations where their Toyota Camrys (of the same model year) suffered the unintended acceleration problem alleged to have caused the accident in the present case.

Reconsidering Reconsideration

The Eighth Circuit again explained to Toyota that the admission of “similar-incident” evidence is an issue within the discretion of a district court, and absent clear and prejudicial abuse of that discretion, it will not be overturned. The appellate court also found that the district court did not just admit any and all other similar incidents, but in fact carefully considered each beforehand, and limited the information. These facts serve to show that the court was careful to not abuse its discretion.

Furthermore, the appellate court noted that Toyota had the opportunity to cross examine the witnesses presenting the similar incidents and was able to differentiate the similar incidents from the case at bar, which serves to eliminate much of any alleged prejudice.

Toyota Saves an Interest Payment, Again

While the Eighth Circuit did agree that Toyota should not have been subjected to a judgment including prejudgment interest, the prior June 2017 decision reached the same conclusion as the August 2017 decision. 

Related Resources:

  • United States Eighth Circuit Cases (FindLaw’s Cases & Codes)
  • Workers’ Rights to Make Racist Comment While Picketing Affirmed (FindLaw’s U.S. Eighth Circuit Blog)
  • Lawyers Avoid Federal Sanctions in Forum Shopping Case (FindLaw’s U.S. Eighth Circuit Blog)

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Civil Rights

Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court

Criminal

Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records

Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules