In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action alleging that defendant-hospital board deprived plaintiff-physician of his First Amendment right of free speech through a campaign of retaliation against him for speaking out about substance abuse at the hospital, summary judgment for defendants is affirmed where neither the hospital’s investigation of plaintiff nor its warning letter to him constituted an adverse employment action for First Amendment purposes.
Read Couch v. Bd. of Trustees of Mem. Hosp. of Carbon County, No. 08-8001
Appellate Information
Filed November 17, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Ebel
Counsel
For Appellant:
Elizabeth A. Phelan, Gregory R. Piché and Mark B. Wiletsky, Holland & Hart LLP, Boulder, CO
For Appellees:
Janet Schroer, Monty Barnett, John Lebsack and James M. Meseck, White and Steele, P.C., Denver, CO
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
