In an action claiming that plaintiff was entitled to part of an amount refunded by the Federal Trade Commission following a judgment against plaintiff and defendants, dismissal of the action as untimely is affirmed where defendant’s actions in raising the reserve requirement of entities partially controlled by defendant gave rise to plaintiff’s claims in 2000, and therefore the statute of limitations began to run at that time.
Read Coto Settlement v. Eisenberg, No. 08-35966
Appellate Information
Argued and Submitted October 14, 2009
Filed January 29, 2010
Judges
Opinion by Judge Cudahy
Counsel
For Appellant:
Ernst Leonard, Friedman & Feiger, L.L.P., Dallas, TX
For Appellees:
Derek A. Newman and Derek Linke, Newman & Newman, Attorneys at Law, Seattle, WA
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
