In a non-party’s appeal from the district court’s denial of an “Application for Permission to Interview Jurors for Instructional Purposes” pursuant to N.D. Okla. L.R. 47.2.1, the appeal is construed as a writ of mandamus and the district court is ordered to reconsider the matter pursuant to a meaningful exercise of its discretion in support of its ultimate determination.
Read Clyma v. Sunoco, Inc., No. 08-5153
Appellate Information
Filed February 3, 2010
Judges
Opinion by Judge Baldock
Counsel
For Appellant:
Mark Hammons of Hammons, Gowens & Associates, Oklahoma City, OK
For Appellee:
James B. Lebeck, Vinson & Elkins LLP, Houston, TX
John D.W. Partridge of Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Denver, CO
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
