In a petition for review of the NLRB’s order finding that petitioner had interfered with its employees’ exercise of rights protected under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) and imposing remedial measures, the petition is denied where: 1) while an employer may assert that an employee’s conduct is unprotected under the NLRA because it had an unlawful objective, the acts or objective of the national union cannot be imputed to an individual employee; and 2) petitioner’s repudiation was insufficient to cure its unlawful confiscation of union flyers.
Read Cintas Corp. v. NLRB, No. 09-1344
Appellate Information
Submitted: September 21, 2009
Filed: December 15, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Murphy
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
