In an action for breach of contract and promissory estoppel, district court’s grant of summary judgment for defendant is affirmed where: 1) the court properly concluded that the parties’ letter of intent governed their relationship after a certain date, and the letter of intent unambiguously gave defendant the right to terminate the parties’ relationship; and 2) the court did not err in granting defendant summary judgment on plaintiff’s alternative claims for equitable relief since it correctly determined that the letter of intent, as modified and extended, governed the parties’ relationship.
Read Cherne Contracting Corp. v. Marathon Petroleum Company, LLC, No. 08-2723
Appellate InformationAppeal from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota.Submitted: March 11, 2009Filed: July 22, 2009
JudgesBefore MURPHY, MELLOY, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.Opinion by MELLOY, Circuit Judge.
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules