In a dispute involving insurance liability coverage, district court judgment is affirmed where defendant is not obligated to indemnify plaintiffs under the consent judgment as defendant did not have a duty to defend and provide coverage to the plaintiffs, and therefore it did not breach any duty and was not estopped from asserting the consent clause as a bar to coverage.
Read Castronovo v. National Union Fire Ins. Co., No. 08-3316Appellate InformationAppeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, Hammond Division.Argued: May 15, 2009 Decided: July 6, 2009
JudgesBefore EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge, and BAUER and FLAUM, Circuit Judges.Opinion by FLAUM, Circuit Judge.
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
