In an action alleging excessive force by the police, district court judgment denying defendants’ motion for summary judgment based on qualified immunity is affirmed where: 1) the court did not err in concluding that the officer’s use of force was not objectively reasonable as a matter of law; 2) the law is clearly established such that a reasonable police officer is informed that it is unlawful to Taser a nonviolent, suspected misdemeanant who was not fleeing or resisting arrest and posed little or no threat to anyone’s safety; and 3) a jury could find defendant is not entitled to official immunity because he willfully violated plaintiff’s right to be free from excessive force.
Read Brown v. City of Golden Valley, No. 08-1640
Appellate InformationAppeal from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota.Submitted: December 12, 2008Filed: July 22, 2009
JudgesBefore WOLLMAN, RILEY, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.Opinion by WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge.
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
