In an action for tortious interference with plaintiff’s expectation of employment, summary judgment for defendant is affirmed where plaintiff failed to create a triable issue on whether there was purposeful interference by the defendant that prevented the plaintiff’s legitimate expectancy of employment from ripening into a valid business relationship, as he had no evidence that defendants prevented him from obtaining clinical privileges at the hospitals in question.
Read Botvinick v. Rush Univ. Medical Center, No. 08-1966
Appellate InformationAppeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. Argued April 6, 2009Decided July 24, 2009
JudgesBefore BAUER, SYKES, and TINDER, Circuit Judges. Opinion by TINDER, Circuit Judge.
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
