Dismissal of plaintiff’s action against the Indiana University School of Optometry arising from his expulsion from the school is affirmed as the court correctly concluded that plaintiff failed to point to any specific promise that the university made which established that plaintiff might have had an entitlement to a continuing education or any other entitlement. As such, plaintiff’s complaint failed to contain enough information to state a legally cognizable claim.
Read Bissessur v. Indiana Univ. Bd. of Trustees, No. 08-3504
Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis DivisionArgued February 25, 2009Decided September 11, 2009
Judges
Before Flaum, Williams, and Tinder, Circuit Judges
Opinion by Williams, Circuit Judge
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
