In a capital habeas matter, the denial of Petitioner’s petition is affirmed, where Petitioner was not prejudiced by any of his counsel’s alleged errors during the sentencing phase of his trial, because there was no reasonable probability that the sentencing judge would have reached a different result in the absence of the alleged errors.
Read Bible v. Ryan, No. 07-99017
Appellate Information
Argued and Submitted March 26, 2009
Filed July 1, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Gould
Counsel
For Appellant:
Daniel D. Maynard, Maynard Cronin Erickson Curran & Sparks, PLC, Phoenix, AZ
For Appellee:
Terry Goddard, Office of the Attorney General for Arizona, Phoenix, AZ
Kent Cattani, Office of the Attorney General for Arizona, Phoenix, AZ
Robert J. Gorman, Office of the Attorney General for Arizona, Phoenix, AZ
J.D. Nielsen, Office of the Attorney General for Arizona, Phoenix, AZ
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
