In a retaliation and employment discrimination action against the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, district court did not err: 1) in finding that DHS did not discriminate against the plaintiff because of her age; 2) in finding that plaintiff was not constructively discharged as her working conditions were not objectively intolerable; and 3) in concluding that plaintiff’s retaliation claims were time-barred as she was sufficiently familiar with the 45-day time requirement.
Betz v. Chertoff, No. 08-3027
Appellate Information
Submitted: June 11, 2009
Filed: August 28, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Arnold, Circuit Judge
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
