District court’s judgment in favor of plaintiff in his ERISA suit against his former employer’s retirement plan is affirmed as defendant’s rejection of plaintiff’s claim was not substantially justified in reducing his benefits under the 1997 amendment after he transferred from the United Kingdom to the US affiliate.
Read Bandak v. Eli Lilly, No. 09-1620
Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division
Decided November 18, 2009
Judges
Before: Posner, Rovner, and Williams, Circuit Judges
Opinion by Posner, Circuit Judge
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
