In an action seeking to quiet title and enjoin defendant from attempting to claim disputed waters for public use, district court judgment dismissing the suit is affirmed where: 1) the court erred in concluding the case is not ripe for adjudication as there is a live controversy; and 2) the court reached the proper result and the case must be dismissed as the suit against the Arkansas Attorney General in his official capacity is bared by the Eleventh Amendment and the Ex Parte Young exception does not apply.
Read Anderson-Tully Co. v. McDaniel, No. 08-3469
Appellate InformationAppeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas.Submitted: June 9, 2009Filed: July 7, 2009
JudgesBefore BYE, HANSEN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.Opinion by BYE, Circuit Judge.
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
