In a product liability action, a denial of prejudgment interest to plaintiff is affirmed where the district court employed an improper presumption that plaintiff was not entitled to prejudgment interest simply because its damages estimates were inconsistent, but plaintiff’s damages were not sufficiently calculable to serve as a basis for prejudgment interest under Utah law.
Read AE, Inc. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., No. 07-1526
Appellate Information
Filed August 11, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Lucero
Counsel
For Appellant:
Stephen G. Masciocchi, Holland & Hart LLP, Denver, CO
David L. Black, Holland & Hart LLP, Denver, CO
For Appellee:
Roger P. Thomasch, Ballard, Spahr, Andrews & Ingersoll, LLP, Denver, CO
Mary A. Wells, Ballard, Spahr, Andrews & Ingersoll, LLP, Denver, CO
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
