In a petition for review of the denial of petitioner’s asylum application, the petition is denied where: 1) the BIA properly required corroboration of petitioner’s testimony; and 2) though the three letters submitted by petitioner supported the conclusion that petitioner’s claimed clan and subclan existed, the law was that in order to reverse the BIA finding, the court of appeals must find that the evidence not only supported such conclusion, but compelled it.
Read Aden v. Holder, No. 08-71168
Appellate Information
Argued and Submitted February 12, 2009
Filed December 18, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Kleinfeld
Counsel
For Petitioner:
Victoria Diaz, Ruben Aranda, Linda Imonode, and Mark Sorokin, University of Arizona College of Law, Tucson, AZ
For Respondent:
Gregory G. Katsas, Stephen J. Flynn and Mark C. Walters, Department of Justice, Washington, DC
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
