Judges want their courtrooms to be respected and they can demand a high level of professionalism from those who appear before them. If you’re ever appearing before Judge Richard Posner, pay attention to detail! A three-judge panel of 7th Circuit Court of Appeals reprimanded attorneys for filing an allegedly misleading and unprofessional brief.
The attorneys identified in the decision, Kenneth Kirschner and Lyndon Tretter, came from the firm of Hogan Lovells and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit on Tuesday issued a decision criticizing the firm for a brief it filed on behalf of the Girl Scouts of the United States.
According to Thomson Reuters News & Insight, the panel of the 7th Circuit drew particular attention to the fact that the attorneys from Hogan Lovells had misrepresented precedent in their brief.
The law firm allegedly substituted the word “group” for “party” in the brief, distorting the case law, alleged Judge Posner when rendering the opinion. Judge Posner also noted that this “could not be accidental.”
The brief went on to state that the lower court had granted summary judgment to The Girl Scouts of the United States on all counts, which was inaccurate. In reality, the lower court had determined that The Girl Scouts of the United States had violated Wisconsin law, but that such violation was inconsequential.
“We stand by our brief and are disappointed by the authoring judge’s characterization,” said partner Lyndon Tretter in a statement emailed to the ABA Journal.
Related Resources
- Girl Scouts of Manitou Council, Inc. v. Girl Scouts of the US of Am., Inc., 08-2488 (FindLaw Cases)
- Browse 7th Circuit Court of Appeals Opinions (FindLaw)
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
