Back in the days of the Watergate scandal, Congress vowed to beef up tax-donor and privacy protections in order to minimize “potential and actual disclosure.” Over time, it became widely accepted that donors could make monetary contributions to organizations listed as non-profits without the need to file the usual “Schedule B.”
Enter California Attorney General Kamala Harris who began to demand the filing of Schedule Bs under the threat of sanction and fees against the donees. Fury Ensues. No matter, the Ninth Circuit will expose you as a donor to the Koch brothers in the end.
It began when Attorney General of California Kamala Harris demanded that charitable Schedule B listings be made available to her office; she sent that demand to the Koch Brothers, the wealthy backers to the conservative Americans for Prosperity group.
“Clearly Erroneous”
But the victory would not last. On appeal, the Ninth Circuit overturned the lower federal court’s ruling and said that the AFP’s concerns about the chilling of free speech were “clearly erroneous” and that it failed to justify the reasoning behind its fear. In the meantime, while that list is being handed over, the suit is pending a decision.
This is the second time that Harris has successfully won in court to compel non-profits to pony up their donor lists. Its looking like California’s reputation for being amenable to left leaning ideals is quite on track.
Related Resources:
- Kock Brother’s Can’t Keep List From California (Bloomber)
- Adobe Loses Copyright Infringement Case to Software Surplus (FindLaw’s U.S. Ninth Circuit Blog)
- University Was Right to Deny Teacher Who Approved of Pedophilia (FindLaw’s U.S. Ninth Circuit Blog)
- Arizona Death Sentence Was Unconstitutional, En Banc 9th Rules (FindLaw’s U.S. Ninth Circuit Blog)
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
